Financial Market Regulation (MiFID II) threatens the Energy Union objective Issue: May 2015 |
CEER has advised the European Commission of the risks to energy market liquidity and prices faced by energy consumers of the proposed changes to financial market regulations. Links between Financial (MiFID II) and Wholesale Energy (REMIT) Regulation Energy regulators very much support the goals of financial regulation. However, we believe that thecurrent proposals for MiFID II (level 2) legislation (“Delegated Acts”) will narrow unduly the scope of the exemption agreed by the legislators in the primary MiFID II law. The European Commission (DG FISMA) is currently preparing (for adoption in July 2015) the MiFID II (“level 2”) rules based on the advice of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). Energy regulators (CEER and ACER) have major concerns regarding Section C6 (the definition of “must be physically settled”) and Section C7 (contracts deemed to be “equivalent”) in ESMA’s advice. The problem of the proposed (level 2) rules – reduced liquidity in energy markets Let’s have “Better Regulation” Simply, CEER advocates that wholesale energy contracts which are “physically settled” should be subject to REMIT, and to protect the “REMIT carve-out” as it stands in the MiFID II primary legislation. See CEER advice to the European Commission, our advice to ESMA and our Press Release. |